Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sarah M's avatar

I appreciate the sharing of your thoughtful exploration of shadow work. Carolyn Elliott's Existential Kink should not be considered source material, though. Or maybe you're just referring to your sources for this particular inquiry? There are so many more reputable sources on depth psychology and shadow work out there. Like Jung himself, or Marion Woodman and Robert A. Johnson. Carolyn Elliott is like the Wikipedia of sources on shadow work. She clumsily slapped the BDSM/kink part onto depth psychology and elements of it are really off and incongruent. Don't be fooled by her PhD - which has nothing to do with psychology, analytic or otherwise - or the fact that she's been published. It's like a new age, witch craft publishing house.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts